Department of Defense Enters Controversial Social Media Monitoring Agreement
Shared By Peter Boykin – American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Political Candidate
Department of Defense Enters Controversial Social Media Monitoring Agreement
Department of Defense Enters Controversial Social Media Monitoring Agreement
A recent revelation sheds light on a $2.5 million contract between the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and social media surveillance firm Dataminr. This agreement, unveiled through a US government notice, has raised concerns about the expansion of digital monitoring capabilities, fueling apprehensions about increased surveillance and its potential impact on free speech and privacy rights.
The contract, facilitated at Fort George G. Meade, a significant hub that houses the National Security Agency (NSA), suggests an undisclosed effort to bolster espionage capabilities.
DISA, situated at Fort Meade, is now rumored to possess extensive access to public content across various social media platforms, including X, formerly known as Twitter.
Dataminr specializes in AI-powered real-time information discovery and is renowned for its ability to detect, classify, and assess the importance of public information in real-time. Government entities, including the Department of Defense, may employ such services to monitor social media and other public data sources, allowing them to stay abreast of unfolding events and potential threats with greater speed.
The use of tools like Dataminr by government agencies has raised legitimate concerns among privacy advocates and proponents of free speech. The implications for personal freedoms, civil liberties, and the foundations of democracy are substantial. There is a prevailing fear that, with insufficient oversight, the government may misuse these tools to surveil lawful activities and individuals going about their daily lives without criminal intent.
The depth and breadth of data that can be gathered, often without individuals’ knowledge or consent, are viewed as invasive, sparking alarm over the erosion of online anonymity. The awareness that one’s digital activities and online presence may be under scrutiny can stifle free expression and cause individuals to second-guess sharing opinions that challenge prevailing norms or provoke discussion.
This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin
Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin
