Election Countdown Puts Focus on Policy and Candidates

Written by on July 29, 2024

 

Election Countdown Puts Focus on Policy and Candidates

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

Trump vs Kamala 2024

Trump vs Kamala 2024

Election Countdown Puts Focus on Policy and Candidates

As the election approaches, the political landscape in our Constitutional Republic has become increasingly charged. The recent decision by the Democratic Party to position Kamala Harris as their leading candidate has stirred significant debate and analysis. This strategic shift, perceived by some as a recalibration of their campaign, has placed Republican candidates on alert, emphasizing the need to remain steadfast in their messaging and policy advocacy.

Opinion-based content indicates that some Republicans feel the media and entertainment industry have created an environment that challenges their candidates more than in recent memory. This sentiment has galvanized the Republican base, underscoring the importance of focusing on policy issues that resonate with voters.

Supporters of the Republican platform argue that their policies are superior, particularly in areas such as border security, healthcare, law enforcement, and criminal justice. They point to concerns that Kamala Harris’s policy proposals could lead to an open southern border, provide healthcare to undocumented immigrants, defund police departments, and eliminate cash bail, potentially allowing violent criminals to be released without sufficient oversight. These views reflect a broader concern about maintaining law and order and ensuring that immigration policies protect national interests.

The phrase “Keep Calm and Make America Great Again,” often associated with Republican messaging, highlights the party’s call for a return to policies they believe will strengthen the nation. This slogan encapsulates a desire for stability, economic growth, and strong national security.

As the election nears, it is clear that the race will hinge on contrasting visions for the future of the United States. The Republican emphasis on policy clarity and their critique of the Democratic approach aims to sway undecided voters and solidify support within their base. The outcome will ultimately depend on which message resonates more effectively with the American electorate, reflecting the diverse and dynamic nature of our Constitutional Republic.

Analyzing Kamala Harris’s Stance on Policing

As the election approaches, it’s crucial to examine where candidates stand on key issues, particularly those that impact public safety and law enforcement. The mainstream media often overlooks these discussions, so providing a detailed analysis becomes essential for voters seeking clarity.

In a conversation with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Kamala Harris shared her views on the “defund the police” movement during the protests following the death of George Floyd. Harris emphasized the need to “re-imagine safety” in America, suggesting that it is “outdated, and it is actually wrong and backward to think that more police officers will create more safety.” This statement reflects a broader debate about the role of law enforcement in maintaining public order and safety, which is a central concern for many voters.

Harris’s support for reallocating funds from police departments to other community services was further demonstrated when she praised Los Angeles for cutting $150 million from its police budget. This decision aligns with calls from some activists to shift resources towards social services, mental health support, and community outreach programs. However, this approach has sparked controversy, particularly among those who believe it could compromise public safety.

Additionally, Harris’s encouragement for her supporters to contribute to bail funds for individuals arrested during the protests, including members of groups like ANTIFA and BLM, has been a point of contention. Critics argue that such actions may undermine the rule of law and public trust in the justice system.

As we evaluate candidates’ policies, it’s important to consider these perspectives and their potential implications for our Constitutional Republic. The discussion around law enforcement, public safety, and community investment remains a pivotal issue in this election, reflecting broader societal debates about justice, equity, and the role of government in ensuring the well-being of its citizens.

 

Kamala Harris’s Controversial Truancy Law: A Closer Look

That time Kamala Harris tried to put parents in jail

As the election season intensifies, it is crucial to scrutinize the policies and actions of those seeking the highest offices in our Constitutional Republic that ensures our Democracy. One such figure is Kamala Harris, whose record as District Attorney of San Francisco raises significant concerns, particularly regarding her stance on truancy.

The Truancy Law: During her tenure, Harris supported Senate Bill 1317, enacted in 2010. This law made it a misdemeanor for parents whose children missed more than 10% of school days without a valid excuse. The penalties were severe, including fines up to $2,000 and potential jail time of up to one year. The intent was to combat truancy, but the implementation and consequences drew considerable criticism.

Criticism and Controversy: Critics argued that the law disproportionately impacted low-income and minority families, failing to address the root causes of truancy, such as economic hardship or medical conditions. A notable case involved Cheree Peoples, who was arrested after her daughter, suffering from sickle-cell anemia, missed 20 days of school. This case highlighted the law’s insensitivity to the complexities of family and health issues.

Character Concerns: Harris’s support for such punitive measures raises questions about her judgment and leadership style. Critics suggest that her approach demonstrated poor judgment, as incarcerating parents does not inherently solve truancy and may exacerbate family instability. Additionally, some argue that this policy reflects a tendency towards authoritarianism, a concerning trait for anyone seeking higher office.

During her presidential campaign in 2019, Harris expressed regret for supporting the law, acknowledging its flaws. However, this retrospective regret does not erase the impact of her decisions on affected families.

Harris’s record on truancy laws is a critical issue for voters to consider. It reflects broader concerns about her approach to governance, particularly regarding policies that affect vulnerable populations. As we continue to evaluate the candidates, it is essential to remember the principles of accountability and justice that underpin our Constitutional Republic. Voters deserve leaders who demonstrate compassion, sound judgment, and a commitment to policies that truly serve the public interest.

 

Kamala Harris’s Role as ‘Border Czar’

In the lead-up to the election, the role of Vice President Kamala Harris as the “Border Czar” has become a contentious issue, particularly among conservative circles. Recent media narratives appear to downplay her involvement in managing the border crisis, leading to criticism that corporate media is attempting to shield Harris from accountability.

Background and Media Coverage: Axios, a prominent news outlet, recently published an article asserting that “Republicans have tagged Harris repeatedly with the ‘border czar’ title — which she never actually had.” This statement, however, is contradicted by earlier reporting, including by Axios itself. In 2021, Axios noted, “Harris, appointed by Biden as border czar, said she would be looking at the ‘root causes’ that drive migration.” Other major news networks such as CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, and CBS News have also referred to Harris in this role.

Official Statements: President Biden, in a press conference, outlined Harris’s responsibilities, stating, “I have asked [Harris]… to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle… stemming the migration to our southern border.” While Biden did not explicitly use the term “Border Czar,” his remarks clearly positioned Harris as the lead figure in addressing border-related issues.

Public Opinion and Border Policy: The handling of the border situation remains a critical issue for many Americans. Since the Biden administration took office, over 10 million illegal aliens have reportedly entered the United States. This surge has prompted calls for stricter immigration policies. A CBS News poll indicates that 62% of Americans, including 53% of Hispanic voters, support mass deportations of illegal immigrants, reflecting widespread concern over the current approach to border security.

Media and Political Implications: The media’s portrayal of Harris’s role and the subsequent backlash highlight broader concerns about media bias and accountability. Additionally, it was revealed that GovTrack, a website tracking politicians’ voting records, had removed a page detailing Harris’s voting record in the California Senate, where she was noted for having a “radical left” voting stance. This action further fuels debates about transparency and media influence in shaping public perception.

The Broader Context: As Harris eyes the Oval Office, her record on immigration and border security becomes a focal point. The border crisis, characterized by record numbers of illegal crossings, poses a significant challenge to her candidacy. The media’s efforts to distance her from these issues are viewed by some as an attempt to mitigate political damage. However, it remains crucial for voters to have access to comprehensive and accurate information to make informed decisions.

The ongoing discussion about Harris’s role as “Border Czar” underscores the complexities of the immigration debate and the need for clear, accountable leadership in addressing these challenges. The Constitutional Republic’s principles call for transparency and accountability, which are essential in evaluating the policies and performance of public officials.

Trump Leads in Key Issues as Election Nears

As the presidential race intensifies, Donald Trump continues to hold a significant lead over Kamala Harris on key issues that resonate with American voters. In the wake of Joe Biden’s departure from the race, polls have shown a consistent preference for Trump’s policies, underscoring his position as a trusted candidate on critical matters.

A recent poll conducted by The Times in partnership with YouGov surveyed 1,170 registered voters, revealing a slight overall preference for Trump at 46%, compared to Harris’s 44%. This poll delved deeper into specific issues, offering a clearer picture of voter sentiment:

– Economy: Trump 51%, Harris 41%
– Immigration: Trump 52%, Harris 40%
– Foreign Policy: Trump 49%, Harris 42%
– Crime: Trump 49%, Harris 40%
– Abortion: Trump 37%, Harris 51%

The data indicates that Trump is favored on economic management, immigration, foreign policy, and crime, areas that are pivotal to voters’ concerns. Notably, Harris leads on the issue of abortion, reflecting a complex landscape where public opinion varies significantly.

A separate survey from The Center Square Voters’ Voice identified the top issues for voters, including inflation, illegal immigration, the economy, abortion rights, and crime. This survey highlights the nuanced priorities of the electorate, with abortion remaining a challenging area for Trump and the broader Republican base.

The question of whether the country is ready for a female president was also addressed in the polling, with 54% of respondents expressing readiness, down from 63% in 2016 when Hillary Clinton was the nominee. This decline may indicate evolving perceptions of female leadership or reflect specific concerns about Harris as a candidate.

Recent polling trends show Trump leading in most surveys, with notable exceptions being a narrow advantage for Harris in Reuters and Morning Consult polls. However, the overall trend points to Trump’s dominance on key issues, reinforcing his appeal among voters who prioritize economic and security policies.

As the campaign progresses, it is crucial for Republicans to emphasize the distinctions between Trump’s policies and those proposed by Harris. The current focus on Harris’s campaign momentum, described as a “honeymoon” phase, may obscure substantive policy debates. Republicans argue that Harris’s policies could represent a continuation, or even an intensification, of the previous administration’s direction, which they view as detrimental to the nation’s well-being.

This election cycle remains highly dynamic, with voter concerns shifting and new developments constantly emerging. The Republican strategy will likely continue to highlight Trump’s strengths in managing the economy, securing borders, and ensuring public safety, contrasting these positions with Harris’s record and proposals. As the election draws closer, the importance of clear, issue-based communication will be paramount in swaying undecided voters and solidifying support.

[Source: The Times, Brietbart, NY Post, The National Pulse, Heritage Foundation, Newsweek]

 

 

 

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Shared by

#GoRightNews https://GoRightNews.com

Each Month GoRightNews Spends Hundreds of Dollars and Hours To Run This Site and Podcast, with no sponsors or ads this comes out of our pockets, if you like what you see consider donating to the podcast. Thanks!

Support The Podcast


#GoRight with Peter R Boykin

#GoRightNews

Donate To Support GoRightNews

GoRightNews.com

GoRightNews's Twitter

Go Right News Facebook


Join Peter Boykin on Kick

Peter Boykin on Kick


Join Peter Boykin on Telegram

@RealPeterBoykin on Telegram


Join Peter Boykin on Facebook

Peter Boykin's Facebook


Join Peter Boykin on GAB

Peter Boykin's GAB


Support The Podcast and Website
To Donate to the Podcast (NOT THE CAMPAIGN)

Support The Podcast





[There are no radio stations in the database]