Elite Ad-Cartel’s Influence on Conservative Media Unveiled

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

Elite Ad-Cartel’s Influence on Conservative Media Unveiled

How an elite ad-cartel drowns conservative media

House Judiciary Committee Investigates Advertising Monopoly’s Impact on Conservative Outlets

The House Judiciary Committee, led by the GOP, has revealed alarming evidence indicating that a vast advertising conglomerate is using its financial clout to censor conservative media. This investigation suggests that these actions may violate antitrust laws, raising significant concerns about media freedom and fairness in advertising practices.

Unveiling the Cartel’s Influence

The committee’s report highlights the activities of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which is allegedly working to divert advertising dollars away from prominent conservative news platforms like Fox News and Breitbart News. This effort is seen as part of a broader strategy to silence conservative voices through financial deprivation.

Understanding GARM

GARM, established by the World Federation of Advertisers, encompasses the world’s largest brands, controlling a staggering 90% of global advertising expenditures. This organization wields substantial power in determining where ad dollars are spent and, consequently, which media outlets thrive or struggle.

Judiciary Committee’s Findings

The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have uncovered internal documents and communications revealing GARM’s deliberate attempt to suppress conservative media through economic means. Some key points include:

Expressed Bias: An email from a senior GARM executive revealed a strong bias against conservative outlets, stating disdain for their “ideology and bulls**t.”

Targeted Boycotts: In 2022, GARM organized a boycott of Spotify, targeting Joe Rogan for allegedly spreading COVID-19 misinformation.

Coordination Against Social Media: Following Elon Musk’s acquisition of X (formerly Twitter), GARM coordinated a boycott that led to an 80% decline in the platform’s revenue.

These actions suggest a coordinated effort to undermine conservative media by restricting their access to essential advertising revenue.

Legal Implications

Republicans argue that GARM’s practices violate the Sherman Act, which prohibits conspiracies that restrain trade and commerce. This viewpoint asserts that GARM’s actions constitute an illegal attempt to manipulate the advertising market and suppress certain media voices.

Perspectives from the Left

On the other hand, some argue that companies retain the right to select the media outlets where their advertisements appear. This perspective emphasizes corporate autonomy in making branding decisions, even if it results in reduced support for conservative platforms.

Potential Congressional Actions

In light of these findings, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro recently testified before the House. He suggested that Congress should “use subpoena power to uncover whether there has been some sort of coordination between government executive brand agencies and organizations like GARM.” This call to action underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in the relationship between government bodies and influential advertising entities.

Opinion-Based Content

The expressed disdain for conservative outlets by a GARM executive and the accusations of coordinated boycotts against specific platforms reflect opinion-based content. Additionally, the legal interpretation of GARM’s actions as violations of the Sherman Act includes a perspective that may be contested by opposing viewpoints.

This investigation by the House Judiciary Committee sheds light on the significant influence wielded by advertising conglomerates and raises important questions about media freedom and fairness in the advertising industry within our Constitutional Republic.

[Source: Washington Examiner, The Federalist, Morning Wire podcast]

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]