J.D. Vance’s Dominating Debate Against Tim Walz

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

J.D. Vance’s Dominating Debate Against Tim Walz

#GoRight with Peter Peter R Boykin

The recent Vice-Presidential debate between ­ Senator J.D. Vance and Governor Tim Walz gave us a stark contrast between two very different visions for the future of our Constitutional Republic. This debate wasn’t just a political contest; it was a moment where Vance shined, showing why Donald Trump chose him as his running mate for the 2024 election.

Setting the Stage:

The debate was hosted by CBS News anchors Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan. The ground rules were clear: the moderators would not fact-check the candidates. Instead, the two candidates were to fact-check each other, providing a platform for an open exchange of ideas. However, the moderators quickly broke this rule, which added fuel to some of the most controversial moments of the night.

Over the course of the 90-minute debate, topics like immigration, the economy, abortion, gun violence, and climate change were discussed. Both candidates sparred, but Vance dominated, especially when the focus turned to policy specifics and the current administration’s failures.

J.D. Vance Strikes Early:

One of the earliest, and perhaps most telling, moments of the debate came when Governor Walz attempted to pin the blame for Iran’s nuclear advancement on Donald Trump. Vance responded with a blistering retort: “Who has been the vice president for the last three-and-a-half years? And the answer is your running mate, not mine.” This quick, decisive response set the tone for the rest of the debate. Vance was not there to let Walz rewrite history or to shy away from pointing out the obvious failures of the Harris administration.

Moderators Break Their Own Rules:

What was supposed to be a rule-driven debate soon turned into something else. Margaret Brennan, one of the moderators, stepped in to fact-check Vance on immigration. When Vance raised concerns about illegal immigration overwhelming towns like Springfield, Ohio, Brennan interrupted, stating that Springfield had a large number of Haitian migrants with legal status. She attempted to dismiss his claims, but Vance wasn’t about to let it slide. He pushed back, explaining that the CBP One app had made it easier for illegal migrants to gain legal status—an issue tied to the administration’s failure to secure the border.

At this point, CBS News made the questionable decision to cut off Vance’s microphone, silencing his response mid-debate. Brennan, appearing to enjoy the moment, told Vance, “The audience can’t hear you because your mics are cut.” It was a moment that clearly revealed an attempt to control the narrative rather than allow for a fair discussion. This is where opinion intersects with fact—the moderators did not uphold the rules they established at the outset, leaving the audience with a biased view of the immigration debate.

Walz’s China Blunder:

Another key moment came when Walz was pressed on a false claim he made about being in China during the Tiananmen Square massacre. Walz had previously claimed to have witnessed the event firsthand, but when confronted, he admitted to “misspeaking.” His backpedaling did little to restore his credibility, and Vance, capitalizing on the moment, highlighted how such a significant misrepresentation should raise questions about Walz’s trustworthiness. This wasn’t just about a gaffe—it was about the integrity required for someone aspiring to be vice president.

Sympathy and Strategy:

J.D. Vance’s sharp wit and strategy were on full display when he likened Walz’s debate defense to playing “Whack-a-Mole.” Vance argued that Walz had to deny Donald Trump’s successes—like raising take-home pay and reducing inflation—while simultaneously defending Kamala Harris’s poor economic record, which has left everyday Americans struggling with rising costs of gas, groceries, and housing. This back-and-forth illustrated the stark contrast between the Trump administration’s accomplishments and the failures of the current leadership. Vance didn’t just criticize; he offered a clear vision of how things could be better under a new administration.

Walz’s Cringe-Worthy Moment on Gun Violence:

One of the more bizarre moments came during the discussion on gun violence, where Walz made the puzzling claim that he had “become friends with school shooters.” The comment raised more than a few eyebrows. While empathy is important, Walz’s statement seemed wildly out of touch with the seriousness of gun violence in America. Pollster Frank Luntz went so far as to call it “the worst line in any 2024 debate.” This moment served to highlight the disconnect between Walz’s rhetoric and the reality of the issue at hand.

The Aftermath:

Leading into the debate, the betting odds were not in J.D. Vance’s favor. Polymarket, an online betting platform, gave Walz a 70% chance of winning the debate. But by the end of the night, the narrative had flipped. Post-debate polls showed Vance as the clear winner by a margin of 73% to 27%. This dramatic shift in public opinion reflected the strength of Vance’s arguments and his ability to effectively counter Walz’s points.

Trump’s Reaction:

Donald Trump, as expected, was thrilled with his running mate’s performance. On Truth Social, Trump posted repeatedly, praising Vance’s command of the debate. One standout post read, “JD Vance just CRUSHED Tampon Tim with the FACTS. America was GREAT when I was President, and we will Make America Great Again.” This show of support only solidified Vance’s position as a strong contender alongside Trump.

A Win for Vance and the Trump Campaign:

In the end, Vance’s performance demonstrated why he was chosen to run alongside Trump. His ability to stay focused on the issues that matter—immigration, the economy, and the failures of the Harris administration—resonated with voters. Walz, on the other hand, struggled to maintain his credibility, especially when forced to confront his falsehoods about China and his confusing stance on gun violence.

As we look ahead, it’s clear that this debate has reinforced the vision of a stronger, more secure America under a Constitutional Republic. J.D. Vance’s commanding performance not only highlighted the shortcomings of the current administration but also laid out a path forward—one rooted in liberty, economic strength, and securing our nation’s borders.

That’s all for now. Stay tuned to #GoRight with Peter Boykin, where we continue to stand for truth, liberty, and the Constitution.

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]