Shared by
#GoRightNews https://GoRightNews.com
#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin
American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty
Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin
Like the Content? Please Support!
Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/
Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1
Kamala Harris has faced significant bipartisan criticism following her proposal to introduce government-mandated price controls on grocery stores—a move that critics argue echoes failed economic policies from communist regimes. This proposal aims to address the inflationary pressures that have surged during her time in office.
Background on Harris’ Policy Proposals
Harris has been under scrutiny for weeks due to the absence of specific policy proposals, with many pointing out that her campaign website notably lacks a ‘policy’ section. The recent outline of her economic agenda, revealed during a speech to supporters in North Carolina, centers on the controversial idea of imposing mandatory price controls on privately-owned grocery stores.
The Controversial Proposal
Harris has blamed grocery store owners for “price gouging” and vowed to pursue “the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food.” This rhetoric suggests that Harris believes “bad actors” in the grocery industry are responsible for escalating prices. However, it’s important to note that U.S. grocery stores typically operate on very thin profit margins, ranging from just 1% to 3%.
Historical Perspective
The idea of government-imposed price controls is not new, and history offers cautionary tales. In the 1970s, the Soviet Union attempted similar controls, as did Venezuela in the 2010s. Both nations experienced disastrous results, including food shortages, the collapse of producers, and widespread economic decline. These historical examples serve as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of such policies.
Media Backlash from Liberal Outlets
Even typically left-leaning media outlets have criticized Harris’ proposal. The Washington Post, often considered part of the liberal media landscape, harshly criticized the policy, warning, “When your opponent calls you ‘communist,’ maybe don’t propose price controls?” This highlights the extent of opposition to Harris’ plan, even among those who might generally align with her politically.
The State of Inflation and Grocery Prices
Since Harris assumed office, grocery prices have surged by 22%. During her North Carolina speech, she pointed out that when Donald Trump was president, essentials like ground beef and a loaf of bread were significantly cheaper—by about 50%. This remark underscores the inflationary pressures that have burdened American families.
Additional Proposals and Economic Impact
In addition to price controls, Harris proposed a $6,000 tax credit for families during their child’s first year and a $25,000 subsidy for first-time homebuyers. Economists estimate that these new proposals would come with a hefty price tag, costing American taxpayers more than $1.7 trillion.
Funding and Fiscal Responsibility
When questioned about how she plans to fund these expensive initiatives, Harris provided a vague and convoluted response, stating, “The return on that investment, in terms of what that will do and what it will pay for, will be tremendous… I think it’s a mistake for any person who talks about public policy to not critically evaluate how you measure the return on investment.” This response has drawn criticism for its lack of clarity and specificity.
Donald Trump’s Critique
Donald Trump did not hold back in his criticism of Harris’ proposal, labeling it as “socialist price controls” and warning of the potential consequences. He stated, “Comrade Kamala announced that she wants to institute socialist price controls. You saw that? Never worked before… It will cause rationing, hunger, and skyrocketing prices.”
Opinion-Based Content
The article contains opinion-based content, particularly in the description of Harris’ response as a “word-salad” and the sarcastic remark, “…isn’t it incredible how someone can say so little while saying so much?” Additionally, the characterization of Harris’ policy as “communist-style” and the labeling of her economic proposals as reminiscent of failed Soviet and Venezuelan policies are also opinion-driven.
This reimagining of the article offers a critical yet balanced perspective on Kamala Harris’ proposals while maintaining a Constitutional Republic viewpoint and Conservative/Moderate Republican partisanship slant.
[Source: NY Post]
This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin
Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin
Like what you see?
#GoRight with Peter Boykin
Follow Telegram
Follow on Kick
https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
Tags:
#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC
#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Shared by
#GoRightNews https://GoRightNews.com
#GoRight with Peter R Boykin
#GoRightNews
Join Peter Boykin on Kick
Join Peter Boykin on Telegram
Join Peter Boykin on Facebook
Join Peter Boykin on GAB
Support The Podcast and Website
To Donate to the Podcast (NOT THE CAMPAIGN)