Trump’s Bold Move Against Birthright Citizenship: A Defense of American Sovereignty

Written by on January 23, 2025

Trump’s Bold Move Against Birthright Citizenship: A Defense of American Sovereignty

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

 

Trump’s Bold Move Against Birthright Citizenship: A Defense of American Sovereignty

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape of our Constitutional Republic, President Donald Trump has issued an executive order aimed at fundamentally redefining who qualifies for American citizenship. The order, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” specifically targets the practice of granting citizenship to children born on U.S. soil to non-citizen parents, particularly those here illegally or on temporary visas.

 

Historical Context and Legal Foundation:

The debate centers around the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, enacted in 1868, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Historically, this amendment was designed to ensure citizenship rights for freed slaves after the Civil War, not to provide a pathway to citizenship for children of foreign nationals present in the U.S. without legal status.

 

Trump’s Executive Order:

Trump’s order reinterprets the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” to exclude children of those not fully under U.S. jurisdiction, namely illegal immigrants and those on temporary visas. The President’s action is seen by supporters as a necessary step to protect the nation’s sovereignty and to prevent what they argue is an abuse of the citizenship process.

 

Opinion and Political Reaction:

Critics, predominantly from Democratic states and advocacy groups, have launched legal challenges against this order, arguing it’s an unconstitutional overreach. However, conservative voices like Representative Tom Tiffany have praised the move, highlighting issues like “birth tourism,” where foreigners, particularly from China, travel to U.S. territories like the Northern Mariana Islands to give birth, thereby securing U.S. citizenship for their offspring. Tiffany’s comments on X underscore the national security implications:

Quote: “President Trump was right to end birthright citizenship. Communist China has exploited this loophole by having women travel to the Northern Mariana Islands to give birth, securing U.S. citizenship for their children. It’s a national security threat, and it must end.”

 

Global Perspective:

Globally, the U.S. stands in the minority with its practice of unconditional birthright citizenship. Only 33 countries worldwide offer similar rights, predominantly in the Americas. In contrast, major nations like Germany, France, Japan, and most of Asia and the Middle East follow principles of “jus sanguinis” (citizenship by descent) rather than “jus soli” (citizenship by birth on the soil). This comparison highlights the uniqueness and, according to critics, the vulnerability of U.S. policy to exploitation.

 

Legal Challenges and Future Implications:

The immediate legal response has been swift, with lawsuits filed by 22 states led by Democrats. These cases are set to be heard in federal courts, with a significant hearing already scheduled in Seattle. The legal journey could lead to the Supreme Court, offering a chance to clarify or redefine the application of the Fourteenth Amendment in modern times.

President Trump’s executive order represents a pivotal moment in the discourse on American citizenship. It challenges the notion that geography alone should determine citizenship, advocating instead for a system where commitment to the U.S. and its laws plays a significant role. While legal battles loom, this action has reignited debates about national identity, security, and the true meaning of citizenship within this Constitutional Republic.

 

The Fourteenth Amendment: From Historical Roots to Modern Controversies

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, stands as one of the most pivotal additions to America’s legal framework, significantly influencing civil rights, citizenship, and due process. Its adoption was a direct response to the post-Civil War era’s challenges, particularly concerning the rights of newly freed African Americans. Fast forward to today, and this amendment is once again at the heart of national debate, particularly with President Donald Trump’s bold move to redefine birthright citizenship. Here, we delve into the history, evolution, and current debates surrounding the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

Historical Context and Purpose:

Post-Civil War America: The end of the Civil War in 1865 left the nation grappling with the status of freed slaves. Southern states, once part of the Confederacy, resisted granting equal rights, necessitating federal action.

Drafting and Ratification: Proposed in 1866 and ratified in 1868, the amendment aimed to:

Define Citizenship: Clearly state who was a U.S. citizen, countering the Dred Scott decision by ensuring citizenship for all born or naturalized in the U.S., particularly Black Americans.

Equal Protection: Introduce the Equal Protection Clause to combat discriminatory state laws.

Due Process: Strengthen protections against state actions that could deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process.

 

Key Provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment:

Citizenship Clause: Overturned the Dred Scott ruling by defining citizenship in terms of birth or naturalization in the U.S., under its jurisdiction.

Privileges or Immunities Clause: Intended to protect national citizenship rights, though its use has been somewhat limited in court rulings.

Due Process Clause: Has been instrumental in extending many Bill of Rights protections to apply against state governments.

Equal Protection Clause: Central to civil rights, this clause has addressed issues from segregation to modern discrimination cases.

 

Impact and Evolution:

Civil Rights Legislation: Key to desegregation decisions like Brown v. Board of Education and numerous civil rights advancements.

Incorporation Doctrine: The amendment has been used to apply Bill of Rights protections to the states.

Contemporary Relevance: Continues to influence debates on affirmative action, marriage equality, abortion, and voting rights.

 

The Modern Controversy: Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Challenge

Executive Order: President Trump has issued an order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” aiming to exclude children of illegal immigrants and those on temporary visas from automatic citizenship rights based on the interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Political and Legal Reaction: This move has met with significant opposition, with 22 states, led by Democrats, and advocacy groups filing lawsuits, arguing the order is unconstitutional. 

Global Comparison: The U.S. is among a minority offering unconditional birthright citizenship, with only 33 countries worldwide following similar practices. This has fueled discussions on whether U.S. policy aligns with global norms or invites exploitation.

Security Concerns: Critics like Rep. Tom Tiffany have highlighted potential national security issues due to what they describe as “birth tourism,” particularly from nations like China.

 

Debates Over Interpretation:

Original Intent vs. Modern Application: There’s contention between those who wish to adhere to the amendment’s original purpose and those who see it as needing to adapt to modern societal changes.

Jurisdiction Debate: The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” remains at the heart of current legal battles, questioning its applicability to children of undocumented immigrants or those on temporary visas.

The Fourteenth Amendment has been both a beacon of hope and a battleground for legal interpretations since its inception. Its historical significance in securing rights for African Americans post-Civil War has now evolved into a new arena of debate over birthright citizenship. As we navigate these contemporary challenges, the amendment’s enduring legacy is clear — it continues to shape America’s identity, legal system, and the very definition of citizenship. 

 

For further analysis and updates on this and other critical issues, visit GoRightNews.com. Engage with the discussion on #GoRight with Peter Boykin on platforms like Rumble, Spreaker, Spotify, Apple, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok, and X. Support this initiative to redefine American citizenship by donating at Cash App $PeterBoykin1, with all relevant links available at GoRightNews.com and PeterBoykin.com. Let’s ensure that the future of American citizenship is preserved for those who truly pledge allegiance to our values and security.

 

 

 

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

 

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

 

Tags:

#GoRightNews, #GoRight, #PeterBoykin, #ConservativeVoice, #LibertyPodcast, #MakeAmericaRightAgain, #GOPPodcast, #RightWingTalk, #ConservativeTalk, #ConstitutionalTalk, #NewsForTheRight, #RightSideOfHistory, #AmericaFirstPodcast, #ConservativeCommentary, #PatriotPodcast, #FreedomOfSpeech, #RightViews, #TrumpSupportersPodcast, #ConservativeInsider, #RightSideNews

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

#MakeAmericaHealthyAgain, #RFKJr, #HealthFreedom, #TransparencyInHealthcare, #BigPharmaWatch, #TrumpHealthAgenda, #VaccineSafety, #HealthReform, #EndTheCorruption, #GoldStandardScience, #J6Pardon, #TrumpJustice, #EqualJusticeUnderLaw, #PoliticalPrisoners, #CapitolCases, #LegalDelay, #TrumpInauguration, #PardonPower, #JusticeForJ6, #AwaitingJustice, #FloridaVsFEMA, #PoliticalDiscrimination, #DisasterReliefBias, #HurricaneVictims, #EqualAid, #FEMAControversy, #NoPoliticalAid, #JusticeForAllFloridians, #FEMAInvestigation, #TrumpSupportersRights

Shared by

#GoRightNews https://GoRightNews.com

 

Each Month GoRightNews Spends Hundreds of Dollars and Hours To Run This Site and Podcast, with no sponsors or ads this comes out of our pockets, if you like what you see consider donating to the podcast. Thanks!

Support The Podcast


#GoRight with Peter R Boykin

#GoRightNews

Donate To Support GoRightNews

GoRightNews.com

GoRightNews's Twitter

Go Right News Facebook


Join Peter Boykin on Kick

Peter Boykin on Kick


Join Peter Boykin on Telegram

@RealPeterBoykin on Telegram


Join Peter Boykin on Facebook

Peter Boykin's Facebook


Join Peter Boykin on GAB

Peter Boykin's GAB


Support The Podcast and Website
To Donate to the Podcast (NOT THE CAMPAIGN)

Support The Podcast





[There are no radio stations in the database]