Jack Smith Challenges Judges Ruling on Trumps Documents

Jack Smith Challenges Judge’s Ruling on Trump’s Documents

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

Jack Smith is Attacking a Judge for Upholding This Critical U.S. Law

Jack Smith Challenges Judge’s Ruling on Trump’s Documents

Special Counsel Jack Smith is ramping up his attack on U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon for her recent ruling regarding the handling of classified documents by former President Donald Trump. Cannon’s decision, which allowed Trump to retain sensitive materials at his Palm Beach residence under the President Records Act (PRA), has drawn sharp criticism from Smith and his team.

Smith contends that Cannon’s order, based on what he calls a “fundamentally flawed legal premise,” misinterprets the PRA. Enacted in 1978, the PRA permits former presidents to maintain personal documents post-office but mandates the return of official presidential records to the National Archives.

In response, Smith’s team filed a scathing rebuttal, dismissing Cannon’s interpretation of the PRA as irrelevant to the case. They argue that Trump never formally designated the documents as personal under the PRA, challenging the validity of their retention at Mar-a-Lago.

Critics have long accused Smith of spearheading a politically motivated investigation into Trump’s handling of classified material. In 2023, a CNN analyst accused Smith of attempting to jail Trump before the election. Moreover, the Supreme Court’s rejection of Smith’s bid for an expedited hearing on Trump’s presidential immunity claims further fueled suspicions of bias.

Adding to the controversy, revelations surfaced regarding the Justice Department’s efforts to conceal the identities of individuals working for the special prosecutor, raising doubts about the impartiality of Smith’s investigation. As the legal battle intensifies, Smith’s pursuit of Trump continues to spark fierce debate over the boundaries of executive privilege and the rule of law.

[Source: Independent UK, National Post]

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Follow GoRightNews on Rumble

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]