Musk Files Lawsuit Accusing Advertisers of Violating Antitrust Laws

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

Musk Files Lawsuit Accusing Advertisers of Violating Antitrust Laws

Musk declares war on advertising mafia

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Elon Musk has initiated legal action against several advertisers, accusing them of unlawfully conspiring to boycott his social media platform, X, in violation of antitrust laws. Musk’s lawsuit underscores a broader battle over the influence and control of advertising dollars in the digital age, where a few large players can significantly impact the market.

The Lawsuit Details

Musk, along with X Corp. CEO Linda Yaccarino, announced the lawsuit targeting the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), the World Federation of Advertisers, and several major companies including CVS Health, Mars, Orsted, and Unilever. The suit alleges that these entities colluded to withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue from X, following Musk’s acquisition of the platform in 2022.

Understanding GARM

GARM, described by critics as a cartel, was established by the World Federation of Advertisers. This organization is composed of the world’s largest brands, controlling a staggering 90% of global ad spending. Musk’s lawsuit suggests that GARM’s influence has enabled it to coordinate actions that undermine competition, particularly targeting platforms that challenge the status quo.

Economic Impact on X

Following the alleged boycott, X’s advertising revenue reportedly plummeted by nearly 60% between April and May of 2023. This sharp decline highlights the significant influence that major advertisers wield over digital platforms, particularly when they act in concert.

Escalation of Tension

Yaccarino, in an open letter to advertisers, accused them of abandoning X under false pretenses. She emphasized that X had made substantial efforts to address safety concerns, only to be met with dismissal. “We’ve worked in good faith to showcase our innovations and allay concerns, yet many companies chose to dismiss the facts. To those who broke the law, we say enough is enough,” Yaccarino stated.

Elon Musk echoed Yaccarino’s sentiments, taking a more combative stance by declaring, “We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war.” This response indicates a significant escalation in the conflict between X and its advertisers.

Broader Context

This legal battle is set against a backdrop of concerns about the suppression of conservative media voices. Earlier in the year, an investigation by Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee revealed efforts to silence conservative outlets by cutting off their ad revenue. In one revealing email, a senior GARM executive expressed disdain for conservative ideologies, stating that he “hated [conservative outlets’] ideology and bulls**t.”

This isn’t the first time GARM has found itself in controversy. In 2022, the organization led a boycott of Spotify after accusing popular podcaster Joe Rogan of spreading “misinformation” about COVID-19. These actions raise questions about the power GARM and its allies hold over the flow of information and commerce in the digital realm.

Legal Implications

The House Judiciary Committee believes that GARM’s coordinated actions may constitute a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. This section of the law prohibits conspiracies that restrain trade or commerce. If proven, these actions could have significant legal and financial repercussions for the organizations involved.

Opinion Note

The portrayal of GARM as a cartel and the framing of the boycott as a direct attack on free market principles reflects a viewpoint that aligns with concerns about the concentration of power among a few large corporations. The language used by Musk and Yaccarino, particularly in their public statements, also suggests a belief that this conflict is as much about ideological control as it is about economic interests.

In this battle, Musk appears to be positioning himself not just as a defender of his company, but as a champion of broader principles of liberty and competition within the framework of our Constitutional Republic.

[Source: Daily  Caller, Washington Examiner]

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]