Trump Fills MAGA Square Garden: The Rally That Shook New York

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty

Web: https://PeterBoykin.com
Kick: http://Kick.com/PeterBoykin
Rumble: http://Rumble.com/GoRightNews
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boykin4congress
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoRightNews
Telegram: http://t.me/realpeterboykin

Like the Content? Please Support!

Stripe: https://gorightnews.com/donations/support-gorightnews/

Cash App: http://Cash.app/$PeterBoykin1

Trump Fills MAGA Square Garden: The Rally That Shook New York

 

We’re starting with some big news that could reshape the political landscape. With the election right around the corner, the Real Clear Politics polling average shifted dramatically as former President Donald Trump edged past Vice President Kamala Harris in the polls. This development comes as Americans continue to wrestle with questions about the country’s economic path, fueling political divides across the nation.

Trump is peaking at the right moment. Not only is he gaining ground, but his economic policies now have the favor of 44% of voters, compared to Harris’s 30%. Meanwhile, a staggering 52% of Americans report feeling worse off than they were four years ago, according to recent surveys. With Biden attempting to rally behind Harris by offering to campaign for her, it’s worth noting that her campaign remains hesitant—a clear indication of the tensions within her camp as the election heats up.

Let’s dive into some of the latest headlines, dissect the facts, and see what’s happening on the ground.

Welcome to #GoRight with Peter Boykin

Hey there, patriots! This is Peter Boykin, and welcome to #GoRight, where we’re all about getting to the heart of what’s happening in our Constitutional Republic. As always, we bring you the facts, not the spin, cutting through the noise with a Constitutionalist viewpoint for liberty, ensuring that you get news grounded in the principles of our founders and a clear-eyed look at today’s issues.

Today we’re diving into the big headlines making waves across the country—headlines that reveal the tension in our economy, shifts in political support, and where the media is leaning this election season. We already looked at how Trump has surged in recent polls, with the Real Clear Politics average showing him ahead of Kamala Harris for the first time since August. This is huge, folks. Polls are indicating a change in momentum as more Americans say they’re feeling worse off now than they were just a few years back.

And we’re not stopping there. We’ll get into the Washington Post’s unprecedented decision *not* to endorse Harris—yes, you heard that right—and what that says about the administration’s standing with some of its usual media allies. There’s a real disconnect growing in Washington, and voters are starting to take notice.

At #GoRight, we believe in an America united under the Constitution, where everyone’s voice matters. So stay tuned as we break down the facts, lay out the big picture, and fight for the truth. This is Peter Boykin—let’s get started!

 

Politics: Trump’s Rising Popularity and Economic Approval

With Trump pulling ahead in the Real Clear Politics average, the former president’s platform seems to resonate now more than ever. With 44% of Americans showing preference for his economic agenda over Harris’s 30%, the sentiment marks a strong shift toward concerns over inflation, energy policies, and job growth under the current administration. This surge comes with the backdrop of the Washington Post’s decision not to endorse Kamala Harris—a notable shift that reflects waning confidence from even her usual media allies.

The opinion-based reporting around this refusal to endorse Harris has highlighted frustration with her handling of domestic issues and her perceived inability to address them head-on. As Americans grapple with concerns over rising living costs and job insecurity, the endorsement (or lack thereof) from legacy media outlets may be a bellwether for the Democratic Party’s overall stance heading into the election.

Economics: Struggling Citizens Want Solutions, Not More Campaign Promises

Perhaps the most compelling figure in recent polls is that 52% of Americans say they feel worse off now than four years ago. This sentiment goes beyond partisanship—it underscores a fundamental dissatisfaction with the economy and increasing cost of living, from grocery bills to homeownership.

A significant majority across political lines express frustration over what they perceive as a widening gap between the government’s promises and real results. Trump, capitalizing on this frustration, has positioned himself as a champion of returning economic stability to the nation. Biden’s support for Harris’s candidacy thus appears to be a calculated risk, yet it’s complicated by Harris’s hesitation to fully embrace his endorsement due to fears of voter backlash—a choice that raises questions about unity within the party’s leadership.

Media and Endorsements: Washington Post Refrains from Backing Harris

The Washington Post’s decision to abstain from endorsing Kamala Harris reflects mounting unease among typically supportive media circles. While the paper has yet to release a formal statement, opinion-based pieces from several editors suggest that hesitations stem from a mix of policy disagreement and an overarching disillusionment with the administration’s progress on core issues.

Some journalists have even argued that Harris’s administration struggles with a perception gap, where Americans feel ignored or marginalized, despite promises of inclusion and growth. Although the Washington Post hasn’t backed an alternative candidate, its neutrality speaks volumes and could potentially influence moderate and undecided voters.

Campaign Dynamics: Biden’s Support for Harris Meets Resistance

As President Biden steps in to offer his support, his willingness to campaign for Harris signals an attempt to consolidate Democratic unity amid internal concerns. However, sources close to Harris’s team suggest her advisors are wary, fearing Biden’s association could deter undecided voters who feel the current administration hasn’t lived up to its promises.

Biden’s involvement in Harris’s campaign could ultimately prove to be a double-edged sword, rallying core supporters while alienating voters unhappy with his administration’s handling of critical issues. Harris’s team, keen to avoid being viewed as overly dependent on Biden, finds itself in a difficult position, reflecting the broader challenge within the party to maintain cohesion without compromising electability.

As we move closer to the election, these headlines reveal the Constitutional Republic deeply engaged in debates over the future. From economic policies to party unity, the decisions made in the coming months could alter the trajectory of the nation. At #GoRight, we’re here to cut through the noise, offering facts and reasoned analysis in this pivotal moment.

 

Federal Judge Orders Virginia to Reinstate Voter Registrations of Over 1,600 Residents Previously Marked as Ineligible

In a recent development, a federal judge appointed by the Biden-Harris administration ordered the state of Virginia to restore the voter registrations of more than 1,600 individuals. These residents had previously been removed from the voting rolls after reportedly self-identifying as illegal immigrants.

The judge’s decision points to a specific focus on the eligibility criteria used in voter registration processes. According to reports, this group of individuals had been removed under Virginia’s enforcement protocols designed to maintain accurate and lawful voter rolls. However, the court’s ruling mandates the reinstatement of these registrations, suggesting potential procedural or legal missteps in the initial removals.

This ruling comes amid heightened attention to voter roll maintenance practices across the United States, particularly in Virginia, where voter integrity remains a hotly debated issue. The order may spark further debates over how state governments manage voter eligibility and the accuracy of election systems, with some election integrity advocates voicing concern over the implications this decision could have for state-level autonomy in election management.

The Biden administration’s appointee behind the decision has been criticized by some for what they perceive as overreach, while others argue that this move is necessary to ensure all residents receive due process regarding their registration status. This complex issue raises important questions about balancing the protection of voter rights with ensuring only eligible citizens participate in elections.

MAGA Square Garden Trump’s Historic Madison Square Garden Rally Energizes Supporters in New York

Donald Trump brought his campaign to New York City in spectacular fashion with a historic rally at Madison Square Garden, dubbed “MAGA Square Garden” by supporters. In a bold move, Trump aimed directly at the heart of deep-blue New York, packing out the iconic 20,000-seat venue and filling surrounding streets with tens of thousands of additional supporters. This event marks one of the most memorable campaign rallies of the election cycle, drawing a roster of high-profile allies and sparking both enthusiasm and controversy.

Star-Studded Guest List

Trump’s campaign pulled out all the stops with a star-studded guest list, inviting an eclectic mix of high-profile figures from various fields. Among those present were tech mogul Elon Musk, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, political commentator Tulsi Gabbard, environmental activist and independent presidential candidate RFK Jr., wrestling legend Hulk Hogan, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe, TV personality Dr. Phil, and others, creating a powerhouse line-up of supporters and speakers. Each guest brought their unique perspective, adding depth to the rally’s themes of American greatness, resilience, and economic revival.

The Size and Impact

The demand for entry was so overwhelming that the arena was at full capacity hours before the event officially began, with thousands of supporters outside, cheering and waving signs in support. Elon Musk took to social media to comment on the overflow, noting, “There were over 70,000 people just standing in support in the streets around MSG. The movement is MASSIVE!!” The rally’s enormous turnout was a visible sign of Trump’s broad appeal and the significant support his campaign is amassing as the election nears.

Memorable Moments from Trump’s Speech

As anticipation filled the air, former First Lady Melania Trump took to the stage to introduce her husband. Trump walked out to a live performance by Lee Greenwood singing his anthem, “God Bless the U.S.A.” Trump’s speech was packed with policy announcements, thought-provoking questions, and unmistakable appeals to working-class Americans, with several standout moments:

Simple Question for Americans: Trump opened with a powerful question to the audience, “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” This question resonates deeply with many Americans facing economic struggles, inflation, and rising costs of living, setting the tone for the night.

New Policy for Family Caregivers: Trump announced a policy aimed at helping family caregivers, saying, “I’m announcing a new policy today that I will support a tax credit for family caregivers who take care of a parent or a loved one. It’s about time that they were recognized.” This initiative speaks to millions of Americans who provide care for their family members, often without support.

Strong Stance on Violent Crime: Trump called for the death penalty for any migrant convicted of killing an American citizen or law enforcement officer, underscoring his commitment to law and order with a firm stance on violent crime.

Left-Wing Media Reactions

The mainstream media’s reaction was swift, with CNN and MSNBC attempting to downplay the rally’s success. MSNBC aired a segment during the event with the caption: “Trump MSG rally comes 85 years after a pro-Nazi rally at the famed arena,” an attempt to draw an extreme comparison to historical events. Meanwhile, CNN’s website ran with a headline reading, “Trump loyalists spew racist, vulgar attacks at NYC rally,” implying that supporters’ fervor was somehow menacing or unacceptable. Both reactions highlighted the media’s ongoing hostility and framing of Trump rallies in a negative light.

Controversy Over Tony Hinchcliffe’s Comedy

The rally included a short segment from comedian Tony Hinchcliffe, who delivered a satirical speech that included a joke about Puerto Rico, which stirred controversy. During his act, Hinchcliffe quipped, “[T]here’s a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. I think it’s called Puerto Rico.” This line was quickly taken out of context by media outlets looking to paint the event in a negative light.

Hinchcliffe’s routine, which also made light of Israel, Palestine, Russia, and Ukraine, was a typical example of his brand of comedy, known for its unfiltered humor. Yet, the media’s selective outrage over this line was telling. The same weekend, comedian George Lopez made a joke at a Harris campaign rally about Mexicans being thieves—yet his remark received no backlash, a double standard that further underscores the media’s inconsistent response depending on the political affiliation of the speaker.

A Vision for America’s Future from Elon Musk

One of the rally’s most stirring moments came from Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who delivered a brief yet optimistic message about what he envisioned for America under another Trump term. Musk declared, “America’s not just going to be great. America is going to reach heights that it has NEVER seen before. The future is going to be AMAZING!” His words resonated with supporters, who view Musk as an example of entrepreneurial success and a leader unafraid to challenge the status quo.

Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden demonstrated the massive reach and impact of his campaign, even in traditionally Democratic strongholds. The overwhelming support, both inside and outside the arena, sent a clear message: Trump’s movement is alive, and well, and drawing Americans from all walks of life. As the media continues to critique and spin the narrative, the rally itself stands as evidence of the campaign’s momentum, illustrating the growing enthusiasm and resolve among Trump’s supporters across the country.

[You can watch Trump’s full speech here.]

 

Appeals Court Rules Mail-In Ballots Must Be Received by Election Day for Legality

In a significant ruling, a U.S. appeals court determined that states cannot legally count mail-in ballots received after Election Day, marking a victory for Republicans who argue that deadlines are essential to ensuring election integrity. The decision reinforces the principle that voting should conclude on Election Day to maintain consistency and public trust in the electoral process.

The court’s ruling underscores that states cannot extend the deadline for mail-in ballots beyond Election Day without clear legislation allowing them to do so. The decision reflects a response to ongoing concerns from election integrity advocates who believe that allowing ballots to be counted days after the election creates room for error, confusion, and potential mismanagement.

This decision, however, also raises concerns among those who argue that delays in mail-in ballot delivery—often outside the control of voters—could disenfranchise legitimate voters who mailed their ballots before Election Day but faced postal service delays. Advocates for expanding voting rights have emphasized that, especially in high-turnout or unprecedented voting years, ensuring that every vote is counted may require more flexible timelines.

With mail-in voting becoming increasingly prevalent in the wake of recent elections, this ruling may influence states to reassess their mail-in ballot handling processes and create clearer legislation governing ballot receipt deadlines. The decision is likely to set the stage for further debates and legal challenges as states refine their voting procedures, weighing election integrity against the need to make voting accessible for all citizens.

 

Biden-Harris Administration Accused of Granting “Quiet Amnesty” by Closing Immigration Court Cases

In a move sparking controversy and criticism, the Biden-Harris administration has been accused of quietly granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants by closing thousands of immigration court cases. This “quiet amnesty” allows many undocumented individuals to remain in the United States indefinitely without the need to face formal deportation proceedings, effectively allowing them to stay in the country without obtaining legal residency status.

According to recent reports, immigration authorities have systematically dismissed immigration court cases at an unprecedented rate. By doing so, the administration is said to be prioritizing cases deemed “non-urgent” or those involving individuals with no significant criminal history, which critics argue bypasses due process and circumvents the immigration system.

How the Process Works

The administration has allegedly directed immigration courts to “administratively close” or dismiss cases involving undocumented immigrants without proceeding through traditional legal channels. This practice means that many individuals who enter the country illegally no longer face imminent deportation or legal penalties. Essentially, by closing these cases, the administration is providing temporary relief from deportation, which some argue is akin to granting amnesty without going through legislative or judicial processes.

The legal mechanism for this “quiet amnesty” rests on discretionary practices within immigration courts, allowing judges and immigration officers to deprioritize or close cases based on policy priorities. This has resulted in millions of cases being deferred indefinitely, allowing undocumented individuals to continue residing and, in some cases, working in the United States without fear of removal.

Criticism from Immigration Advocates and Opponents Alike

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from various political and advocacy groups. Conservative lawmakers and immigration enforcement advocates argue that these actions reward illegal immigration and incentivize further illegal crossings, as potential migrants may interpret this as leniency or a lack of enforcement at the southern border. They claim that this move undermines border security and creates a backlog of legitimate cases within the immigration system.

On the other side, some immigrant rights organizations have praised the approach as a compassionate response to the overwhelming number of cases in the immigration courts. With more than a million cases pending, supporters argue that closing these cases allows the government to focus on individuals who pose security risks rather than overburdening an already strained court system with nonviolent individuals or families simply seeking a better life.

However, even some moderate immigration advocates have raised concerns, warning that the approach lacks transparency and clear guidelines. They argue that a policy of this scale should be openly debated and legislated by Congress, rather than being implemented through administrative discretion alone. This, they say, would ensure that the American public has a voice in shaping immigration policy, particularly when it involves such a large number of people.

Impact on Border and Immigration Policy

This policy has added fuel to an already heated national debate on immigration reform and border security. Many argue that policies like these hinder the government’s ability to enforce immigration laws, especially at a time when the number of encounters at the southern border remains high. Critics warn that closing these cases sends a signal to prospective migrants that the U.S. immigration system is flexible to the point of allowing non-compliance with legal entry requirements.

Opponents of the policy emphasize that such practices may have long-term implications for communities nationwide. They argue that the lack of clear policy and oversight could increase demand on social services and the labor market without addressing broader issues of legal immigration reform, placing undue strain on local resources.

Future Legal and Policy Implications

The Biden-Harris administration’s approach to immigration case closures may face legal challenges from Republican-led states and immigration-focused advocacy groups, who argue that the executive branch has overstepped its authority. The legal questions revolve around whether the administration has the discretion to indefinitely suspend cases without congressional approval.

Moving forward, this “quiet amnesty” could shape future policy discussions, forcing Congress to take a definitive stance on immigration enforcement and reform.

 

#GoRight Recap: The Latest Rundown on America’s Crossroads

Trump Fills MAGA Square Garden: In an unforgettable rally at New York’s Madison Square Garden, Trump packed the venue, with thousands more supporters flooding the streets. Big names like Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, and Dr. Phil showed up, underscoring the immense support and excitement around Trump’s campaign. As expected, mainstream media couldn’t resist putting their biased spin on it, but the energy of Trump’s movement is undeniable.

The Biden-Harris Quiet Amnesty: The Biden administration is facing backlash for what critics are calling a “quiet amnesty” after immigration courts closed cases for millions of undocumented individuals, allowing them to remain in the country without the risk of deportation. Immigration reform advocates warn that this bypasses due process and lacks transparency, fueling ongoing debates over border security and America’s immigration policies.

Appeals Court Rules for Election Integrity: In a major win for Republicans and election integrity advocates, a U.S. appeals court ruled that mail-in ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted. This decision affirms the importance of election deadlines and signals the courts’ stance on upholding timely election results.

Virginia’s Voter Roll Controversy: A judge appointed under the Biden-Harris administration has ordered Virginia to reinstate the registrations of over 1,600 people who self-identified as illegal immigrants and were removed from the voter rolls. The decision has ignited a fierce debate over voter integrity and the sanctity of the democratic process.

The energy and fight to uphold American values are growing stronger every day. To stay updated and support our mission, head to GoRightNews.com. Watch more content on Rumble.com, find #GoRight with Peter Boykin on YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, X/Twitter, and more, and help us keep this movement going by donating via Cash App at $PeterBoykin1 or by visiting GoRightNews.com and PeterBoykin.com for all links.

Let’s keep fighting for truth and going right because it’s the only way forward!

 

 

This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit GoRightNews.com for More Articles and Visit PeterBoykin.com to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

https://PeterBoykin.com

Follow Telegram

https://T.me/RealPeterBoykin

https://T.me/GoRightNews

Follow on Kick

https://Kick.com/PeterBoykin

Follow on Rumble

https://Rumble.com/GoRightNews

Tags:

#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme

Shared by

#GoRightNews https://GoRightNews.com

 

Each Month GoRightNews Spends Hundreds of Dollars and Hours To Run This Site and Podcast, with no sponsors or ads this comes out of our pockets, if you like what you see consider donating to the podcast. Thanks!

[/vc_column_text]

Support The Podcast

---

[/vc_column][/vc_row]