Project 2025 Examining Policies That Challenge Constitutional Liberties

Written by on June 27, 2024


Project 2025: Examining Policies That Challenge Constitutional Liberties

#GoRightNews Shared by Peter Boykin

American Political Commentator / Citizen Journalist / Activist / Constitutionalist for Liberty


Like the Content? Please Support!


Cash App:$PeterBoykin1

2025 Project

2025 Project

Project 2025: Examining Policies That Challenge Constitutional Liberties


In recent discussions surrounding the “Mandate for Leadership,” a significant document aimed at shaping future policy, several controversial issues have come to light. These issues pose challenges to liberties guaranteed under our Constitutional Republic.


Controversial DOJ Memorandum


One notable example involves an October 4, 2021, memorandum from Attorney General Merrick Garland. This directive called on the FBI to collaborate with U.S. Attorneys to address threats against school officials. The memorandum was spurred by a letter from the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to President Biden. The NSBA’s letter requested a federal response to perceived threats against school board members, equating some parents’ actions to “domestic terrorism” and hate crimes. This coordination between the NSBA, the White House, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) sparked public outcry and concerns of governmental overreach. Fourteen state Attorneys General condemned the memorandum, suggesting it was a politically motivated attempt to stifle constitutionally protected activities.


Critical Race Theory in Education


The document also scrutinizes the influence of critical race theory (CRT) in educational settings. CRT, as argued, promotes a view that contradicts America’s founding principles of freedom and equality. Legislative proposals are urged to prevent any form of racial discrimination or compelled speech in schools, particularly those under federal control. This stance is grounded in preserving the integrity of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Furthermore, it advocates for transparency in classroom materials to ensure parents are fully informed about the curriculum.


First Amendment Rights


Another critical issue is the protection of First Amendment rights. The document emphasizes the need for the DOJ to zealously guard free speech rights without political bias. It references the Supreme Court case, 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, highlighting how government overreach can infringe upon individuals’ rights to free expression. The case involved a Christian website designer being compelled to create content against their beliefs, underscoring the danger of government-mandated speech.


Opinion-Based Analysis


The document clearly reflects a particular ideological stance, often framing opposition to its viewpoints as radical or unfounded. For example, the critique of the NSBA’s letter and the subsequent DOJ memorandum suggests an interpretation rooted in a conservative perspective that views these actions as an overreach of federal power and an infringement on parental rights.


In sum, the “Mandate for Leadership” brings to the forefront several policies that merit rigorous constitutional scrutiny. The alignment of DOJ directives with political motivations, the incorporation of CRT in education, and the protection of First Amendment rights are pivotal issues that challenge the foundational liberties of our Constitutional Republic. As we navigate these policies, it is crucial to uphold the principles enshrined in the Constitution, ensuring that our democracy remains robust and free from undue governmental interference.


Extra Credit:


The “Mandate for Leadership” document outlines a series of policy recommendations and actions aimed at shaping the future direction of the United States. Here are the key points it seeks to address:


  1. Reform the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI:

– Address perceived overreach and politicization within the DOJ and FBI.

– Ensure that federal law enforcement agencies protect constitutional rights without political bias.

– React to the controversy surrounding the October 4, 2021, DOJ memorandum regarding threats against school officials.


  1. Eliminate Critical Race Theory (CRT) from Federal Education:

– Prohibit the teaching of CRT and other forms of racial discrimination in federally funded schools.

– Ensure that educational content adheres to the principles of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

– Promote transparency in the curriculum, allowing parents to be fully informed about educational materials.


  1. Strengthen First Amendment Protections:

– Defend free speech rights, especially against government overreach and compelled speech.

– Reference Supreme Court cases like 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis to illustrate the dangers of government-mandated expression.

– Ensure that religious freedoms and free expression are safeguarded.


  1. Enhance Parental Rights in Education:

– Advocate for parental involvement and decision-making in educational settings.

– Oppose policies that limit parents’ ability to influence their children’s education and upbringing.


  1. Reduce Federal Government Overreach:

– Limit the power and influence of federal agencies in local and state matters.

– Promote state sovereignty and reduce federal mandates that infringe on individual liberties and state rights.


  1. Promote Transparency and Accountability:

– Increase transparency in government actions and decisions.

– Hold government officials and agencies accountable for actions that may infringe upon constitutional rights.


  1. Economic and Regulatory Reforms:

– Implement policies that promote economic growth and reduce regulatory burdens.

– Encourage free-market principles and reduce government intervention in the economy.


  1. Strengthen National Security:

– Focus on policies that enhance the security of the United States.

– Address threats from foreign adversaries and strengthen the nation’s defense capabilities.


These key points reflect a vision of governance that emphasizes limited federal power, individual liberties, free-market principles, and strong national security. The document advocates for policies that align with conservative and constitutionalist viewpoints, aiming to reshape various aspects of government and society.


Wait there’s more:


The “2025 Mandate for Leadership” document contains several key points that are directly opposed to LGBTQ rights. Here is an analysis of those points:


  1. Dismantling DEI Infrastructure at USAID:

– The document proposes eliminating the Chief Diversity Officer position and DEI advisers and committees at USAID. It suggests removing DEI scorecards, requirements from contract and grant tenders and awards, and halting the promotion of the DEI agenda, which includes LGBTQ+ rights .

– The justification given is that DEI directives create a hostile work environment, threaten merit-based advancement, and politicize a nonpartisan federal workplace. This suggests an intention to roll back institutional support for LGBTQ+ inclusivity in favor of a more traditional approach to diversity and inclusion.


  1. Refocusing Gender Equality on Traditional Roles:

– The document criticizes previous administrations for policies that it claims dilute the focus on vulnerable women, children, and families by including protections for LGBTQ+ individuals under the guise of gender equality and women’s empowerment .

– It advocates for a shift back to traditional gender roles and priorities, effectively marginalizing LGBTQ+ individuals in these policies.


  1. Military Policies on LGBTQ+ Service Members:

– It suggests reversing policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military, arguing that gender dysphoria is incompatible with military service. It also calls for ending the use of public funds for transgender surgeries and abortions for service members .

– This stance directly impacts the rights and inclusion of transgender individuals in the military, promoting a return to previous policies that excluded them.


  1. Health and Human Services Regulations:

– The document recommends issuing a policy statement that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will not enforce prohibitions on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in healthcare under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. It also suggests restoring Trump-era regulations that explicitly exclude sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination .

– This would significantly reduce protections for LGBTQ+ individuals in healthcare settings, potentially leading to increased discrimination and reduced access to necessary medical care.


These proposed policies indicate a clear intention to roll back protections and support for LGBTQ+ individuals across various sectors, including international aid, military service, and healthcare. This conservative approach prioritizes traditional values and beliefs over the inclusivity and rights of LGBTQ+ communities.




This Article is Brought to you by Go Right News and Edited by Peter Boykin

Visit for More Articles and Visit to Learn more about Peter Boykin

Like what you see?

#GoRight with Peter Boykin

Follow Telegram

Follow on Kick

Follow on Rumble


#ncpol #NCpolitics #Boykin4NC #BoykinFor2024 #BoykinForNC

#Android #Apple #Trump #trumptrain #Trump2024 #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #2024Election #election #election2023 #electionchallenge #ElectionIntegrity #ElectionsMatter #ElectionCommission #GoRightNews #GaysForTrump #tuesday #GoRight #ihatemondays #applemusic #applewatch #applepodcasts #ApplePay #appleiphone #bidenisnotmypresident #BIDENSAMERICA #BidenBorderCrisis #Bidenflation #Biden #BidenCrimeFamily #northcarolina #government #Governor #politics #political #politicians #politicalchallenge #politicalmeme



Shared by


Each Month GoRightNews Spends Hundreds of Dollars and Hours To Run This Site and Podcast, with no sponsors or ads this comes out of our pockets, if you like what you see consider donating to the podcast. Thanks!

Support The Podcast

#GoRight with Peter R Boykin


Donate To Support GoRightNews

GoRightNews's Twitter

Go Right News Facebook

Join Peter Boykin on Kick

Peter Boykin on Kick

Join Peter Boykin on Telegram

@RealPeterBoykin on Telegram

Join Peter Boykin on Facebook

Peter Boykin's Facebook

Join Peter Boykin on GAB

Peter Boykin's GAB

Support The Podcast and Website
To Donate to the Podcast (NOT THE CAMPAIGN)

Support The Podcast

[There are no radio stations in the database]